Skip to content

Annex 3

Your Health, Your Care, Your Say - a case example of evaluation

1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9

PreviousNext

Objective Main criteria Detailed criteria
Objective 1:
For the public, providers of care and government to work in partnership to determine policy priorities and design new approaches to future care. This was to be assessed by considering:
  • the range of people / organisations involved, and
  • the extent to which the process enabled those involved to work in partnership.
Range of people:
  • Reached the number of participants / organisations as specified [target numbers set]
  • Achieved a sample to provide findings representative of general public opinion (ethnicity, age, gender and socio-economic status)
  • Involved ‘seldom heard groups’ (e.g. BME, older and young people, people without qualifications, people on low incomes, people with disabilities)
  • Involved groups likely to be disproportionately affected by changes (e.g. those with poor health, less articulate, poor access to health services, heavy users of services, carers).
Range of people:
The process was expected to be:
  • inclusive
  • involve seldom heard groups
  • involve groups disproportionately affected
  • representative
  • participants not demographically / attitudinally biased.
Working in partnership:
  • Transparency and lack of bias in methodology and the analysis process
  • Being viewed by the public as putting them at the centre of the policy-making process
  • Iteration to allow policy options to develop in response to public opinion
  • Integration of results from general public and stakeholder processes (including appropriate timing for assimilation of results).
Working in partnership:
  • No indication of bias within the fieldwork process or analysis process (process to be open and transparent)
  • Participants’ belief that the results of the exercise will be influential
  • Participants’ belief that the results reflect the discussions held
  • Resulting White Paper reflects the priorities identified via the listening exercise (relationship between process results and final decisions)
  • Those involved have a shared understanding of the task they are engaged in
  • Those involved have a shared understanding of its objectives
  • Participants have an opportunity to influence the process itself
  • Participants have the opportunity to learn from each other
  • Participants have sufficient information or resources to enter into the partnership.

1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9

PreviousNext