Download the full Evaluation Guide as a pdf documentAnnex 3
Your Health, Your Care, Your Say - a case example of evaluation1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9
Criteria proposed originally
Objective 1 – public, providers and government working in partnership to
determine policy priorities and design new approaches to future care
| Criteria | Requirement | Evaluation method |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusive | Involvement of seldom heard groups | Process Review |
| Involvement of groups disproportionately affected | Process Review | |
| Representative | Participants not demographically/attitudinally biased | Process Review |
| Open / Transparent | Analysis process | Process Review |
| Extent to which participation is open | Process Review / Stakeholder Interview | |
| Influential | Timing – assimilation of results | Process Review |
| Relationship between results and final decisions: | Process Review | |
|
Review of White Paper in relation to process outcomes | |
|
Policy lead interviews | |
| Dialogic | Shared understanding of processes and tasks | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Policy lead interview, Stakeholder Interview, Observation |
| Equality of voice (Frame setting – ability to raise issues, activity) | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Policy lead interview, Stakeholder Interview, Observation, Process Review | |
| Shared understanding of objectives | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Policy lead interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| Opportunity to learn | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Policy lead interview, Facilitator interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| No bias in information | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Facilitator interview, Stakeholder Interview, Observation, Process Review | |
| No bias in facilitation | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Facilitator interview, Stakeholder Interview, Observation, Process Review | |