Annex 3
Your Health, Your Care, Your Say - a case example of evaluation1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9
Criteria proposed originally
Objective 2 – increasing levels of public engagement in the policy decision
making process
| Criteria | Requirement | Evaluation method |
|---|---|---|
| Interest | Public interest in outcome of listening exercise | Public Qre, Participant Interview |
| Participant interest policy | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| Importance | Public attitude toward listening exercise | Public Qre |
| Participant perception of importance | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| Understanding | Government view of relative importance of these results Public understanding of purpose of exercise | Policy lead interview Public Qre |
| Participant understanding of trade-offs | Participant Interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| Participant understanding of policy process | Participant Interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| Trust | Public trust in listening exercise | Public Qre |
| Participant trust in listening exercise | Participant Qre, Stakeholder Qre, Participant Interview, Stakeholder Interview | |
| Participant trust in government and policy process | Participant interview | |