Published on November 10, 2015

Involve’s ‘Room for a View’ is an exciting contribution to the debate on the shape of democracy’s future : Democratic Audit UK

By Josephine Suherman-Bailey

Josephine is a Policy Analyst at Involve. She supports Involve's work on the UK Open Government Partnership civil society network and Sciencewise. She is especially interested in opening up decision-making to those who might otherwise struggle to be heard by policy-makers.

Ed Hammond, Head of Programmes (Local Accountability), The Centre for Public Scrutiny blogged for Democratic Audit in response to the launch of Involve’s new report, Room for a View, by our director Simon Burall. We’ve cross posted the blog from the Democratic Audit site below.


Looking at democracy as it works in local government, traditional representative models have brought us a long way but are looking traditionally ill-at-ease as new, more informal and more opaque decision-making arrangements are established. The systems and processes evolving to take advantage of the opportunities around English devolution are an excellent example. Leaders of local authorities, selected local partners, civil servants and Government ministers are thrashing these deals out behind closed doors. While we have confidence that those negotiating deals are doing so with the best of intentions and with the needs of local people in mind, they are bypassing traditional democratic systems, which are ill-equipped to deal with the swifter and more flexible means of decision-making that they require.

Part of the challenge is that traditional democratic systems, and traditional “openness”, are seen as too slow and cumbersome to cope with the speedy, flexible decision that will be needed by local areas – first, as they negotiate their deals, and second, as the deals are implemented and councils and their partners collectively juggle their new plans and priorities. But a space has been created – a space for a similarly flexible system of governance, a space for deliberation and reflection in public. This space must be filled for devolution to lead to the transformative change that those in the sector hope it will.

Deliberative approaches to democracy provide an obvious mechanism to do this, and to reintroduce the basic principles of accountability, transparency and involvement into devolved decision-making. Moreover, the novelty of such systems presents the chance to introduce meaningful deliberative systems from the start, rather than to try to reverse-engineer them into existing arrangements in the future. We think that elected representatives can reinvigorate their role if they are recognised as being a key means of ensuring that the “transmission between the public space and the empowered space” that the report discusses actually happens. Non-executive councillors, acting through the overview and scrutiny function of individual councils, and combined authorities, will be a principal means of doing this – of creating and maintaining a formal public spaces where deliberative discussions can both happen, and where they can be directed into formal decision-making frameworks.

This is a fascinating time to be working in the sector – fundamental changes which we had thought for many years to be immutable are suddenly up for grabs. But Simon is right in his paper to highlight democracy as the critical factor in ensuring success, and we look forward to seeing this debate develop and continue in the coming weeks and months.


Visit the site

Leave a Reply