1. Clear purpose

  • The process makes a difference and the decision has not already been made.

  • The process takes place at the right point in the policy making or decision making cycle.

  • The process has a clear question — or set of questions — to address, with a range of possible solutions.

  • The scope for making a difference to the decision is explicitly declared at the start and things that are out of scope or cannot be changed are clearly outlined.

  • Where there is a clear and obvious decision maker they are sincere in their willingness to be open-minded and make a public commitment to consider and respond in detail to the decision or recommendation

  • Processes should be coordinated to ensure policy coherence, avoid duplication and reduce the risk of engagement fatigue. 

Questions you should ask yourself to see if you meet this standard:
1Where there are obvious decision-makers, are they genuinely willing to consider different outcomes?
2Is the process taking place at the right point in the policy making or decision making cycle where it can still influence the outcome?
3Is there a clear question or set of questions that the process will address, and have these been communicated openly with the participants?
4Is there a plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the process in making a difference to the decision(s)?